Re: Whimper. Anybody notice huge spam jump??

From: Scot Hacker <shacker_at_berkeley.edu>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:54:41 -0800

On Nov 14, 2006, at 3:31 PM, Aron Roberts wrote:

> There are a couple of ways to test whether the scripts or
> programs that
> spammers use to extract email addresses from web pages might be
> succeeding at harvesting addresses from your own pages, even if you've
> tried to protect those addresses via various means:
>
> 1. Use a variant of your email address that includes a legal but
> unusual addition, such as the "plus tag" discussed at:
>
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail_address#Plus_.28or_Minus.
> 29_addressing>

Very good analysis / suggestions Aron. Just tested, and it looks
like calmail.berkeley does not accept "plus" tagging of addresses
(though our Mac OS X mail server does).

Thanks,
Scot

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The following was automatically added to this message by the list server:

Webnet information is available at http://webnet.berkeley.edu. Email sent to this list is archived at http://ls.berkeley.edu/mail/webnet/ . This archive is open to the general public and browsable by search engine spiders, email-address harvesting robots, your bosses, etc.
Received on Tue Nov 14 2006 - 15:58:04 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Nov 14 2006 - 15:58:04 PST