The guy's an idiot. He doesn't understand what the policy is, and even if
the policy was what he is claiming (which it isn't), it still wouldn't be
a free speech issue; there is no content regulation at all.
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 09:20:57AM -0700, David Rieger wrote:
> Claims are being made from a presumable academic & research perspective
> that sysAdmins are contributing to the death of "free-speech" at UCB:
>
> [Basically by restricting ports - causing a diminution of freedom of
> association and speech]
>
> >"UC Berkeley now requires permission to receive TCP connections at any
> >port on any computer. This policy is typical of "locked down"
> >corporations, but now applies to all parts of UC Berkeley, including CS.
> >
> >So you might find this interesting.
> >
> >http://www.satn.org/archive/2005_05_01_archive.html#111521463872601897
>
> ###End Quote###
>
> Discussion? Response?
>
> If there is a response, thank you for a communal effort to clarify.
>
>
> david rieger
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The following was automatically added to this message by the list server:
>
> For information about Micronet, including subscribing to
> or unsubscribing from its mailing list and finding out
> about upcoming meetings, please visit the Micronet Web site:
> <http://micronet.berkeley.edu/>.
-- Tom Holub (tom_holub@LS.Berkeley.EDU, 510-642-9069) Director of Computing, College of Letters & Science 249 Campbell Hall <http://LS.berkeley.edu/computing/> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The following was automatically added to this message by the list server: For information about Micronet, including subscribing to or unsubscribing from its mailing list and finding out about upcoming meetings, please visit the Micronet Web site: <http://micronet.berkeley.edu/>.Received on Wed May 4 09:19:30 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 04 2005 - 09:19:31 PDT