So, if there were a relatively painless way to get all of your
old mail into thunderbird, you would have no reason other than
personal ... inertia to switch to thunderbird?
As I recall, Eudora uses mbox format for its own mailstore. I
am pretty sure that Thunderbird can deal with the mbox format.
Feel free to correct me (or at least my recollection)
--Jon
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 03:32:33PM -0800, Ian Crew wrote:
> Just speaking for myself--I have a gig and a half of mail in Eudora
> (not counting attachments and stuff living on an IMAP server), and
> I'd rather not have to be running two mail programs
> simultaneously--one to receive mail, one to look at past messages.
>
> That's probably the largest reason I don't switch to something like
> Mac OS X Mail or Thunderbird.
>
> Ian
>
> At 3:13 PM -0800 3/1/05, Jon Forrest wrote:
> >I'm seeing more and more unexplanable Eudora
> >weirdnessess as time goes on. I've personally switched
> >to Thunderbird, which I've been happy with, and I recommend
> >Thunderbird to everybody I talk to.
> >
> >However, the other day the question came up of whether
> >there is anything that Eudora can do that Thunderbird
> >can't do. I couldn't thinking of anything but I thought
> >I'd put the question out to Micronet. As a second
> >question, other than user training and software
> >distribution issues, is there anything that's preventing
> >you from replacing Eudora with Thunderbird as your
> >recommended email client?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following was automatically added to this message by the list server:
For information about Micronet, including subscribing to
or unsubscribing from its mailing list and finding out
about upcoming meetings, please visit the Micronet Web site:
<http://micronet.berkeley.edu/>.
Received on Tue Mar 1 15:43:01 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 01 2005 - 15:43:10 PST