 |
 |
Ph.D. in Medical Anthropology
(The Joint UCB/UCSF Ph.D. in Medical Anthropology)
ATTENTION
INTERNATIONAL APPLICANTS:
We
strongly recommend that you apply online. If it is not possible for you
to apply online we can mail you a paper application. If you live
outside of North America, a mailing fee of $15.00 will be required. We
require a draft drawn on a U.S. bank, or an international money order
made payable to "UC Regents." No application package will be
mailed outside North American until the fee has been received.
Introduction
Medical anthropology at Berkeley is one of the pioneering
programs in the discipline both nationally and globally. Together with
its sister program at UCSF and the broader intellectual resources of Berkeley's
anthropology department and the rest of the Berkeley campus, the program
provides disciplinary leadership and outstanding and comprehensive training
leading to the Ph.D. degree. No other program offers the Joint Program's
combination of excellence in critical medical anthropology, studies of
science, technology and modernity, intersections of medicine and social
theory, and cutting edge scholarship in the analysis of many fields. These
fields include:
violence and trauma
genomics
and ethics
transplantation
and organ and tissue commodification
citizenship, immigration, and the body
psychiatry, ethnopsychiatry, and psychoanalysis
youth and child survival
hunger, infectious disease, development, and governmentality
traditional medicine and its modernity
sexuality, gender, and the commodity form
geriatrics and dementia
death, dying, and the politics of "bare life"
Graduate students work in these and in many other fields, on single and
multi-sited projects located around the world. The regional expertise
of the Berkeley core and affiliated faculty in anthropology includes recent
and ongoing research throughout the world.
Students may apply for entry into the doctoral program in Berkeley medical
anthropology. Graduate students in medical anthropology at Berkeley take
most of the same courses and work with many of the same faculty as graduate
students in social cultural anthropology and graduate students entering
the UCSF side of the program, but emphases and requirements differ between
these programs. Faculty visitors and prospective postdoctoral fellows
should contact the program
administrator and faculty for more information.
Postdoctoral Positions/Visiting Scholars
There are no paid postdoctoral positions in the Berkeley Department of
Anthropology; however, it may be possible to obtain an honorary Visiting
Scholar appointment. The Medical Anthropology Program has frequently
hosted visiting scholars from other countries when their research and
interests have been compatible Berkeley's Medical Anthropology program.
Those interested should contact individual faculty
members with whom they may wish
to work, stating what it is they are interested in doing, and providing
the faculty members with a C.V.
Critical
Studies in Medicine, Science and the Body
(The research group that comprises the UCB side of
Joint UCB/UCSF Ph.D. in Medical Anthropology)
The core faculty on the Berkeley side of the Joint
Program together form an organized research group called Critical Studies
in Medicine, Science, and the Body. This group links medical anthropology,
science and technology studies, postcolonial and psychoanalytic anthropology, and linguistic anthropology.
There are seven faculty in the group: Nancy
Scheper-Hughes, Program Director of Medical Anthropology; Paul
Rabinow, Director of the Project on Genomics and Society;
Lawrence Cohen,
Co-director of Medical Anthropology, Stefania
Pandolfo, Charles L. Briggs, Stanley Brandes, and Cory Hayden,, . Together with colleagues at Berkeley and UCSF and
with graduate students and postdoctoral scholars in the Joint
UCB-UCSF Medical Anthropology Program
and in the Department of Anthropology, these scholars have created
both the most diverse and the most contemporary program in the field.
The expansion of traditional medical anthropology at Berkeley into Critical
Studies in Medicine, Science, and the Body reflects several disciplinary
breakthroughs associated with our faculty. Though variants of "medical
anthropology" are almost as old as the parent discipline of anthropology,
the organized field emerged in post-war North America as an effort to
link international public health, ethnomedicine, and allied social science
in the service of the anthropology of development. The field shared both
the promise and the limits of modernization theory more generally. Both
the critical Marxist and symbolic/interpretive challenges of the 1970s
and 1980s thickened debate, along with closer links to historical analyses
of the scholarly medical traditions and to the development of qualitative
methodologies concurrent with the expansion of NIH, NIMH, and other governmental
programs of research support.
Despite the rapid growth of the field at this time, most research remained
auxiliary to the categorical if not the political and economic imperatives
of biomedicine. With the arrival of Nancy Scheper-Hughes, Berkeley became
a leader in defining what she famously termed a "critically applied
medical anthropology." Critically applied medical anthropology refused
the theory/applied divide that characterized so many departments and programs,
arguing the impossibility of separating "theoretical" debate
in cultural anthropology and the human sciences on the one hand and more
"applied" commitment to the health and survival of communities
and groups, on the other. Scheper-Hughes's articulation of a critical
anthropology of hunger offers a powerful example of the change in the
field she was instrumental in creating.
The rise of this movement at Berkeley led to a period in the late 1980s
and early 1990s with two dominant programs in graduate training, critical
medical anthropology in the Joint Program at Berkeley and UCSF and interpretive
medical anthropology at Harvard. Lawrence Cohen came from Harvard in 1992
to join Scheper-Hughes, and the teaching and joint research that has resulted
from their collaboration represent a critical and ongoing conversation
bringing together the leading formations in the field. Cohen has worked
to link debates between critical, interpretive, and biocultural medical
anthropologies to broader theoretical questions of materialization that
have emerged in feminist and queer scholarship.
The rapid growth of science studies and the increasing centrality of both
science and the body to contemporary debate in the academy posed new challenges
to medical anthropology. Paul Rabinow has studied the new genomics intensively,
work leading to three books and to the development of what he has termed
an anthropology of reason. Against too-easy criticism of scientific and
medical practice that did not question what Michel Foucault called the
"speaker's benefit" of the critic, Rabinow offered a method
and a form of analysis that offered a way out of the endless battles of
the "Culture Wars." Berkeley anthropology emerged as the most
powerful alternative to the dominant approaches to the sociology of science
and science studies.
From the mid-1990s and on, these two streams of medical anthropology and
the anthropology of reason have been in closer and sharper interaction.
Scheper-Hughes wrote a famous article calling for a "Barefoot Anthropology";
Rabinow offered his own vision of a "Well-Heeled Anthropology,"
and Medical Anthropology Program affliliates Professors Laura
Nader and Aihwa Ong
both authored important responses to this debate. Far from pushing students
towards either pole, the debate constituted a space for encouraging students
to link critical, interpretive, and genealogic analysis. Charles L. Briggs and Clara Mantini-Briggs are studying challenges to neoliberal health policies and new understandings of health, citizenship, and the state emerging from revolutionary healthcare in Venezuela.
In a world of linking new genomics, bioinformatics, and pharmacotherapy
to corporate medicine and public-private hybrid structures internationally,
"bioethics" has become ever more ubiquitous and empty a critical
practice. The question of ethics and more generally of human futures links
the current work of Cohen, Rabinow, and Scheper-Hughes. To this question
and to the related investigation of trauma, loss, and healing, Stefania
Pandolfo brings a rigorous anthropological conversation incorporating
contemporary philosophy and psychoanalysis and her research in a Moroccan
psychiatric hospital.
Pandolfo's work provides a bridge allowing for analysis linking medical
anthropology and recent social theories of language, melancholy and the
body. Pandolfo has offered extensive training to graduate students in
the anthropology of medicine, science, and psychiatry, linking a reexamination
of existential psychiatry and a close engagement with the work of scholars
from Benjamin and Blanchot to Freud, Lacan, and Binswanger to both Mahgrebi
and European clinical and theoretical work.
By tracing genealogies of the unexamined imbrication of theories of language, knowledge, performativity, and representation with research on biomedicine, public health, and traditional medicine, the Joint UCB-UCSF Medical Anthropology Program enables students to critically synthesize linguistic and critical medical anthropology in such a way as to transform both realms of anthropological inquiry. Charles L. Briggs has explored these connections through research on narrative and statistic representations of epidemic disease Latin America; urban violence and its problematic representations; and a five-country study of how understandings of health, disease, citizenship, and the state are profoundly shaped by news coverage of health, all in collaboration with Clara Mantini-Briggs.
Other Berkeley anthropology faculty affiliated with the Medical Anthropology
Program bring important resources to graduate student training in the
critical analysis of medicine, science, and psychiatry. Laura Nader was
instrumental in helping to define the field and remains a leading scholar
of medicine and the state. Stanley
Brandes has studied many topics of relevance to the field,
including alcohol and culture and questions of death and the body. Bill
Hanks researches shamanism, belief
systems and the body. Donald
Moore links the critical spatial analysis of political ecology
to race, nature, and the politics of difference. His ethnographic work
engages micropractices of biopower in the context of colonial and postcolonial
governmentality.
|
|