|
|
|||||||
![]() |
GRADUATE COURSES
The Spring 2006 Schedule can be found here. The Summer 2006 Schedule can be found here.
Note: This course will no longer be offered during spring semesters.
This course introduces students to major currents in social/cultural anthropology, past and present. Throughout the course we will examine research tools and conceptual problems that have helped to shape and define the discipline during its hundred-year history. Particular attention will be given to the problem of ethnographic writing—the key method for the discipline of anthropology. In terms of its themes, the course focuses on several anthropological topics, including, but not limited to, language and culture, gender and race/ethnicity, ritual and religion, meaning and symbols, globalization and social change, etc. What are the conceptual questions behind the empirical studies of other people or cultures? How are these questions related to other forms of social science knowledge? These are two basic questions with which we pursue our introductory topics. Students are required to attend three hours per week for lecture, plus one hour per week for discussion section. Prerequisites: none. Required books: Depending on what one calls a museum, there are approximately sixteen thousand museums in the United States where, it is estimated, a new one opens every 3.3 days. They are among the most visited sites in the world with about 850 million visits per year in the United States alone. Thus museums and museum-going are major activities in the United States. They constitute a major ingredient in tourism, a principal world industry. In this seminar we will look at museums: what they are, what they offer us, and what we bring to them. There will be special emphasis on anthropology and history museums. In particular we will examine the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum on campus and look at its collections. Topics will include a brief history of museums, how they order the world, how they serve as status symbols, how they promote nationalism, methods of display (hands-on or hands-off), museums as entertainment, museums as sales rooms, what objects can explain, museums as education, how they manipulate the viewer, and museums as repositories of the authentic. Students will be asked to pick a single object from the Hearst Museum's objects on display and explain it to the seminar e.g. what's it made of, how is or was it used, how old is it, what does it tell us about the culture from which it came, etc. Students will also be asked to write a label (not to exceed 100 words) for the object. This seminar is part of the Food for Thought Seminar Series. Food for Thought lunch meeting dates, times and locations will be discussed in class. ANTHRO 112: SPECIAL TOPICS IN BIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY: "TOPICS IN BIOLOGY AND CITIZENSHIP: HEALTH, IDENTITY, AND SECURITY" The course is co-taught by Paul Rabinow, professor of anthropology at Berkeley; Roger Brent, Director of the Molecular Sciences Institute, and Paul Billings, Vice President for Biotechnology and Health Care Strategy at Laboratory Corporation of America. This course is cast at an advanced upper-division level. Although there are no formal prerequisites, it is important for students to have familiarity with the basic principles of molecular biology as well as contemporary anthropology. There will be two midterms and a term paper. To do well on these, students will need to be able to read and understand primary and advanced secondary articles detailing and making use of concepts and experimental methods of molecular biology and genetics. ANTHRO 115: INTRODUCTION TO MEDICAL ANTHROPOLOGY These are questions common to many disciplines and many eras; their organization as a field of medical anthropology was in large measure a product of the post-World War II era and Cold War concerns with poverty and sickness in what was then called the underdeveloped world. "Culture"-so-called traditional "beliefs"-seemed an impediment to the implementation of successful public health measures globally, and anthropology as the science of culture seemed to offer tools to fix the problem. Whatever consensus there may have been in the 1950s and 1960s as to what the question was (how to get peasants in poor countries to behave differently) and the answer (use fieldwork to understand culture and then apply this understanding to designing more culturally appropriate health interventions), by the 1970s the field was growing in multiple directions and diverging. Many anthropologists saw not culture but economics as the issue, and more and more came to distrust the whole enterprise of planned development as not fixing but perpetuating poverty. Others were less worried about political economy but felt that "culture" was a much more complex and subtle thing than a bunch of so-called beliefs; they brought in new tools from philosophy, linguistics, sociology, and literature to think about "illness experience" in new ways. These two shifts in the field became known as "critical" and "interpretive" medical anthropology, respectively. The field continued to shift in the 1980s. Many scholars outside anthropology were looking at the body and at illness and health as problems of great importance to general philosophy and general sociology. Scholars focusing on how racial and gender differences came to matter in a given society began to attend to the politics of bodily knowledge and the relations between biology and power in new ways. New approaches to the study of science were growing in popularity in many disciplines and becoming known by names like "science studies." Medicine itself continued to expand and to shift increasingly in the United States toward a "managed care" model. How doctors and other clinicians and healers operated was changing, as was the role of the pharmaceutical industry, of government, of non-governmental organizations, and of patients' groups. All of these changes meant that medical anthropology was less and less a specific subdiscipline and more and more a set of linked questions that scholars across anthropology and across the social and natural sciences had to consider. This course offers an introduction to the field over these different moments, taking from each of these moments questions and debates that still matter and that help us to think about how to understand medicine, health, the body, and life in the present and future. ANTHRO 119: SPECIAL TOPICS IN MEDICAL ANTHROPOLOGY "VIOLENCE, GENOCIDE, AND SOCIAL SUFFERING: PERSPECTIVES FROM MEDICINE, SOCIAL SCIENCE, AND THE HUMANITIES" This course is instructor approval only. Interested students should attend the first class to obtain a class entry code. Part one of the course will introduce students to an interdisciplinary (anthropological, medical, philosophical, theological, and literary) approach to the definition and meanings of violence and suffering. Students will be introduced to Franco Basaglia's "peace-time crimes", Conrad's "heart of darkness"; Immanuel Levinas's "useless suffering"; Bourdieu's "symbolic violence"; Taussig's "culture of terror," Primo Levi's "gray zone"; Agamben's "impossibility of witnessing"; and Foucault's "carceral network". We will contrast ethnographic, literary, documentary, and humanitarian forms of 'witnessing', representing, and responding to violence and genocide. The second half of the course will look at the emergence of human rights discourses and humanitarian responses to violence and their extension to new populations and problems and the creation of new rights (including medical and cultural rights); biological and medical citizenship. We will look at the applications of human rights to medicine, psychiatry, to expanded notions of citizenship, especially in the fraught context of new nation building following civil wars and political violence. Among the questions we will raise are: How do conceptions of human rights vary with respect to different social, cultural and political contexts? What social groups do or do not have recognized human rights? Are specific human rights seen as 'owned' by individuals or by social groups? What notions of 'the human' and 'human dignity' are recognized and encoded in various human rights discourses? Guest speakers who have extensive experience as scholars, artists, and activists dealing with violence, genocide, social suffering and human rights will be an integral part of this course Finally, this course has a optional field research component and practicum through which students will participate as 'interns' in local various institutional field sites, programs, institutions related to the themes of the course. Assigned Readings will be drawn from the following: The majority of archaeological case studies discussed in this course falls into the category of “historical archaeology,” which is defined as the study of excavated remains from periods associated with written documents. This is in contrast with prehistoric archaeology, which deals with periods with no written documents. In the case of Japan, historical archaeology started as the study of early historical periods, namely the study of tombs and temples from the Nara (A.D. 710-794) and Heian (794-1192) periods. However, as archaeologists became more interested in the relationship between material culture and human behavior, they have begun to excavate remains from later periods, including the Medieval period (1192-1600; this includes the Kamakura, Muromachi and Azuchi/Momoyama periods) and the Edo period (1600-1868). Questions that will be addressed in the course include the following: 1) How can excavations of early historical palaces and Kofun tombs shed new light on political struggles described in early historical texts? 2) How can studies of medieval and Edo period ceramics and other trade goods help us understand the expansion of market economy, as well as the interaction with other countries in Asia and Europe? 3) What can archaeologists tell about the health and hygienic conditions of medieval and Edo period people from demographic and pathological studies of skeletal remains? 4) How did the mortuary practice of the Japanese people change over time, and how were the practices related to religious beliefs? 5) What were the lifeways of samurai and commoners, including their foodways, clothing and housing? 6) Where did the Ainu people (an ethnic group who has lived, and still live, primarily in Hokkaido, and whose cultural and linguistic traditions are different from those of the Honshu or “Mainland” Japanese) and their culture come from, and how did the relationship between the Ainu and the central Japanese state change through time? No prerequisites. Although this is an upper division course in anthropology, freshmen, sophomores and students in non-anthropology majors are also encouraged to take this course.
This course relies upon lectures and class discussion of archaeological, anthropological, and ethnohistorical readings in order to look at the origins, impact, decline, and transformation of Inca society in the 14th through 18th centuries. Drawing upon the recent, but growing, body of documentation (including translations of primary historical sources), this course will address the sociopolitical, religious, and quotidian construction of 'an' Inca identity. The last weeks of the course look at the role of "The Inca" in the ritual, economic, and political life of the contemporary Andes. In our consideration of Inca and neo-Inca cultures, we will pay special attention to the following topics: the confluence of landscape, ritual, and politics in the Inca Empire; the complexity of Andean syncretic religious traditions; how Inca conquest and imperial maintenance strategies differed from those of the Spanish; post -Colonial struggles for indigenous sovereignty; and how each generation and political camp constructs its own vision of the Inca past. Two classes per week are given over to illustrated lectures, and the remaining session is devoted to small group discussions (students will divide into groups of 4-5 students and the instructor will circulate through the classroom, monitoring and moderating the conversations). Student debates, student presentations of final projects, and a visit to view Inca material culture currently housed in the Phoebe Hearst Museum of Anthropology round out the syllabus.
ANTHRO 136H: ARCHAEOLOGY AFTER-SCHOOL PROGRAM: "THEORY AND PRACTICE IN THE 6TH GRADE ARCHAEOLOGICAL AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAM" Additional requirement: off-campus after-school mentoring, one afternoon per week (Wed, Thu, or Fri) The Expedition after-school program, which is voluntary, is designed to bring the archaeological experience to 6th graders through facilitated play with a variety of media, including: digital storytelling (video production), computer games, web browsing, hands-on exploration of real artifacts, etc. The facilitator for the Expedition program is Tamara Sturak. Pre-requisites: Students from fields other than archaeology and anthropology are welcome to participate. Bilingual students are strongly encouraged to apply. The Introduction to Archaeology (Anthro.2) or its equivalent or the permission of the instructor are the only prerequisites. Regular access to an email and Internet account are essential. Requirements: This course is essentially a practical research/service-learning course. Participation in the Roosevelt School after-school program (approx. 2-3 hrs one afternoon each week) is a required part of the course. You will be expected to keep fieldnotes of your observations and enter them into the course database each week. Required reading:
Course Description : This course focuses on the use of digital media to create narratives about the practice and the products of archaeology. The Fall 2005 version will be about the public presentation of World Heritage (UNESCO) sites. The ultimate aim of the course is to enable students to create their own digital narratives (videos) or combination live theater/digital narrative from their own research as a collaborative project. Through the course, students build a critical awareness of the way in which digital media are used by archaeologists, journalists, TV producers, film producers, and many others express in a linear narrative format how archaeologists and others construct knowledge about the past and about the many pasts that they have created.. The format is the MACTiA model of technical training and guidance in which a priority is given to well-researched content. Formal instruction will focus on the history, current state and theory behind the use of digital media to present archaeological narratives. Digital media (including film/video, websites, and games) are explored and critically evaluated and compared to non-digital sources (publications, pantings, live theater). At the same time students are guided in studio format through the introductory stages of the digital authoring process, receiving an introduction to video photography and non-linear video editing (iMovie, Final Cut Pro).. The final assignment is the collaborative production of a short digital narrative or a combined digital story/live theater narrative to be performed/presented to an audience at the end of the semester. This course is the prerequisite for an advanced digital narrative production for archaeology course to be offered in Spring 2006. Prerequisites: Anthro 2 (Introduction to Archaeology) or equivalent Reading: (also a large number of web resources)
The course will trace the development of ethnographic film from its
beginnings at the turn of the century to the present. In addition to
looking at seminal works in the field, more recent and innovative productions
will be viewed and analyzed. Topics of interest include the role of
visual media in ethnography, ethics in filmmaking, and the problematic
relationship between seeing and believing. Requirements include film
critiques, a film proposal, and a final exam.
The 1st part of the course will consist mainly of lectures and some videos, with opportunity for student feedback and questions. The 2nd part of the course will consist of lectures, some illustrated by slides and videos; I hope to arrange for guest presentations on the impact and growth of tourism in specific communities, ranging through island cultures, historical cities, and modern nations, by members of those societies and other experts (including students who come from places that are “targets of tourism”). Exams and Assignments: There will be two exams and one graded essay assignment. The mid-term will be a take-home exam with short essay questions requiring synthesis and application of the first subject matter. The final will focus mainly on the second subject matter. Those who do very well in the mid-term and the assignment may be allowed to do a term paper in lieu of a final, if they come up with an appropriate subject for research and analysis. Graduate students are especially encouraged to do a term paper. Required text:
ANTHRO 158: RELIGION AND ANTHROPOLOGY Course description not yet available. Charles L. Briggs is the Alan Dundes Distinguished Professor in Folklore. He has studied jokes, proverbs, ritual, folk art, and several narrative genres. In anthropology, he focuses on linguistic and medical anthropology, social theory, modernity, citizenship and the state, race, and violence. He has conducted research with Latino/a populations in the Southwestern US and in Latin America; he is currently working in California, Cuba, and Venezuela. Course Requirements: Students are required to attend all classes and actively take part in the discussions (20%). There will be a midterm examination (20%) and a final paper (30%) based on your fieldwork project (30%). The fieldwork project topics will be reached in consultation with the instructor during the third week of classes.
This course introduces students to the anthropological study of Maya people in Southern Mexico, Guatemala and Belice. Necessarily selective, the course focuses on certain parts of the Maya region, emphasizing selected themes and problems. In the first half of the semester we will explore regional history in the double sense of the development of Maya studies, and the historical transformations of Maya societies. These two themes will be traced through studies of the Classic Maya, the Spanish conquest and colonization, indigenous resistance and rebellion and recent pan Maya activism. The Yucatan is one of the best studied parts of the Maya region, and will provide a case study through which to critically explore the models, methods and practices of ethnography. In the latter half of the semester, we will examine in detail aspects of contemporary Yucatan ethnography, based on research over the past two decades by myself and others. In this phase, our focus will be the constitution of lived space and the role of shamanic practice in relation to the body, the domestic sphere and agricultural production. The course will be a combination of lectures and discussion, with a midterm in week 8 and a final paper (max 25 pp.) to be turned in during exam week. Class attendance and careful readings are obligatory and will count towards the grade. There are no prerequisites. Reading knowledge of Spanish helpful but not required. ANTHRO 181: THEMES IN THE ANTHROPOLOGY OF THE MIDDLE EAST ANTHRO 183: TOPICS IN THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL STUDY OF AFRICA ANTHRO 189: SPECIAL TOPICS IN SOCIAL/CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY "ANTHROPOLOGY AND DISABILITY" Anthropology is underrepresented in the development of interdisciplinary disability studies. Medical anthropology has traditionally chosen to focus its primary analytic lens on the meaning of illness and its amelioration, minimally addressing variations in cross-cultural concepts of impairment, disability, and accommodation. This is changing. Anthropology is beginning to use theoretically grounded and consistent definitions of these phenomena. This course will supply an overview and will demonstrate the important contributions to be gained from a mutual engagement between anthropology and disability studies. We will present the anthropology of disability by engaging multiple perspectives on the sociocultural construction of disability and impairment. The international disablement experience brings up important issues at the interface of identity, society, and culture. These issues are not always necessarily tied to the narratives of cause and cure with which medical anthropologists are familiar, but in some cultural contexts can clearly be viewed as social exclusions and their impact. The distinction between disability meanings and illness meanings and their sometimes intersection and interaction requires theoretical elaboration and this course will address this distinction as well as engage other unique perspectives in discourse on anthropology and disability. Requirements: This class is designed for upper-division undergraduates and graduate students with some background in anthropology and in disability studies. It will be a lecture/discussion class with a significant amount of reading. Active class participation is expected. Grading will be on the basis of class participation, reaction papers, a midterm exam, and a final research paper.
GRADUATE
COURSES This graduate seminar is REQUIRED for all first and second-year graduate students in archaeology. It is open to other students in anthropology and in other departments who are interested in the history and theory of archaeological practice. Particular attention in the seminar will be given to the Anglo-American tradition of archaeological practice, although other intellectual regions will be considered, depending upon the areas of student interest and research. In particular we shall focus on the emergence and specification of the so-called "ecological-evolutionary "paradigm: how and why it came to take the form(s) that it did, what issues and approaches were precluded or marginalized, what "gains" it has achieved, and how and why it set the stage for the various "post-processualist" types or archaeology that have emerged recently. There will be regular discussions and extensive reading. Students are expected to attend all classes, to participate and to be prepared. In addition, one major research paper (20-25 pages long) and probably a few debate presentations will be required during the course of the semester.
Required texts: Howard Becker, 1986. Writing for Social Scientists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
ANTHRO 250A: PSYCHOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY "MADNESS, MEMORY, POSTCOLONIALITY" Course description not yet available. ANTHRO 250C: GLOBALIZATION "THE ANTHROPOLOGY OF GLOBALIZATION" There is no agreement as to what "globalization" means. One may argue, however, that in the social sciences, the term has a general marker for heterogeneous and often contradictory transformations -- in economic organization, social regulation, political governance, and ethical regimes -- that are felt to have profound though uncertain, confusing, or contradictory implications for contemporary human life. Increasingly, the phenomena that concern social scientists assume spatial forms that are non-isomorphic with standard units of analysis such as country, nation, and culture. The emergence of various localisms and regionalisms, along with "transnational" patterns have been the subject of growing interest and investigation. This is a problem that cuts to the heart of contemporary social sciences. Many observers believe that we have witnessed a shift in the core dynamics of social, cultural, economic and political life. In anthropology, we have had a range of analytical responses. One approach has been to track migrant flows and the emergence of "transnational" communities. Another view has been to stress cultural flows that come to reconstitute new spaces or "scapes" of social organization and activity. A third has been to examine the rise of "localities", however defined, as articulations with, effects of, or dynamic responses or resistances to, global forces. In this seminar, we will discuss a fourth alternative, an approach to globalization as a problem-space that constitutes contemporary anthropological problems. We will consider the methodological implications of a perspective that takes into account particular assemblages of mobile "global forms," politics, and ethics that put at stake what it means to be human today. Requirements: Priority is given to graduate students in Berkeley anthropology. Students are expected to make class presentations and to write a research paper based on theoretical arguments read in class. No incompletes are accepted.
"Theorists and methodologists - get to work!" - C.Wright Mill This seminar offers a broad-ranging yet focused examination of key issues in the epistemology, methodology, practice, and politics of ethnography as an approach to data production and social analysis characterized by personal embeddedness and embodied involvement in the universe under study. Various traditions and styles of ethnographic inquiry in anthropology and sociology (interpretive versus analytic, extended case, narrative, confessional, phenomnological, carnal, historical) are dissected, evaluated and compared in terms of their epistemic assumptions and aims, field techniques and relations, analytical strategies, representational devices, and ethical quandaries. Among the issues we confront are the differences and similarities between ethnography and other methods of social inquiry, the connection of theory to data, the origins and deployment of concepts, the nature and texture of social relations in the field, production and writing standards, and the multiple audiences of ethnography. A second focus of this course is on doing ethnographic fieldwork. Thus, in rather quick order we cover everything from choosing and defining a problem, research design, proposal writing, and protection of human subjects to the tools and techniques specific to cultural and to medical anthropology in a variety of settings from traditional community-based and "street corner" ethnography to research in clinical and laboratory settings, hospitals, schools, jails, mental asylums and refugee camps to multi-sited ethnography among highly mobile workers in global cities. We discuss the limits of inference and understanding based on experience and empathy, and power dynamics and conflicting loyalties in the production of anthropological knowledge. Requirements RESEARCH PROJECT. As this is a seminar on the practice of ethnographic fieldwork, every seminar participant is required to select a feasible research topic, to write a short research proposal, and to dedicate one day a week to fieldwork, to produce fieldnotes on a weekly basis, and to complete a ten page research report by the last seminar meeting. Typed fieldnotes based on handwritten notes are to be handed on a weekly basis after week 7. A final requirement is a 6 page critical reaction paper due at the 5th seminar meeting. Each member of the seminar will choose two ethnographies -- one older and classic and one newer, recent -- and evaluate, compare, contrast the methods used by each. This will require you to be an intuitive reader as many traditional ethnographers are exceedingly vague about, for example, whether the events described were observed or based on interviews. In the end, we want to clarify the distinctive virtues, liabilities, predicament, and promise of the ethnographic craft across the social sciences and kindred disciplines. Readings will be drawn from (among many others) :
ANTHRO 250X-2: SPECIAL TOPICS IN CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY: MODERN THEORIES OF DISCOURSE
During the first part of the seminar readings will be discussed in seminar time and participants will lead the discussions. Possible topics for papers should emerge from these discussions. The latter part of the seminar will include presentations of student research papers. The seminar will be structured by means of four topics: 1) the critique of the study of others; 2) the ubiquitous interest in other peoples that was part of the human experience long before there were social sciences; 3) 20th century views of the peoples of other “civilizations”—Euro-American, Islamic, Indian, Chinese, Japanese; and 4) the reactions and consequences of the present global interaction between and within “civilizations” reflective of differing power positions.
ANTHRO 250X-6: SPECIAL TOPICS IN CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY: CANCELLED
Readings will include works by Anderson (Imagined Communities), Agamben (selections from Homo Sacer), Canetti (selections from Crowds and Power), Cheah and Robbins (selections from Cosmopolitics), Clastres (Society against the State), Deleuze and Guattari, Foucault, Habermas (The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere), Mbembe (Necropolitics, selections from On the Postcolony), Roitman (Fiscal Disobedience), Schmitt (The Concept of the Political), Stiglitz (Globalization and its Discontents. Seminar participants will be asked to write five 5-page response papers to a week’s assigned readings and should be ready to lead discussions for at least two seminar sessions among those they select for close scrutiny.
Requirements: There will be two presentations per student--one a main presentation, and the other a response presentation. These will both be done in pairs. Students are required to write a research paper on a topic of their choosing.
R. Joyce 1 unit M 4-6 160 Kroeber The departmental seminar, which is held on posted Mondays from 4-6 p.m. in 160 Kroeber throughout each semester, presents a range of speakers on current topics in anthropology. Speakers and topics are announced prior to the event on the glassed-in bulletin board opposite the main office (232 Kroeber). All students are invited; however, enrollment is strictly limited to and required of all Anthropology, Medical Anthropology, and Demography graduate students who have not been advanced to candidacy. ANTHRO 290-2: SURVEY OF ANTHROPOLOGICAL RESEARCH: ARCHAEOLOGY GRADUATE STUDENT OUTREACH R. Joyce 1 unit Off Campus Course may be repeated for credit. Preparation for and at least one visit with a designated elementary or secondary school, either at the school or in a schools or groups visit to the campus, bringing aspects of archaeological information and practice to the classroom, in consultation with the specific school and teacher(s). Designed to put into practice core values of contemporary archaeological practice, as specified in the Code of Ethics of the Society for American Archaeology. Readings, workshops, and some resources are provided, but selecting relevant materials, communication and coordination with the teacher of the class to be visited, and prepartory meeting with partners in the visit are anticipated. Total input per semester estimated to be 15 hours. Required each term of all in-residence graduate students in the archaeology program. Must be taken on a satisfactory/unsatisfactory basis. FOLKLORE Wednesday 10-12 pm 2224 Piedmont, # 15 Efforts at understanding the contemporary moment in psycho-political terms have stressed phenomena of de-subjectivation and massive alienation, in contexts of political exceptionality where death looms over the space of life. The resurgence of “archaic” forms of collective identification, with the potential of hatred these entail, and what has been seen as a return of religion, particularly in the context of Islam, are the sites of a growing conceptual anxiety. In recent scholarly debates that have sometimes reached the international media, these phenomena have been described as a fixation with identity of destructive and self-destructive propensity. More specifically in psychoanalytic language, they have been seen as aspects of a generalized mutation of subjectivity, of a psychotic nature, related to parallel mutations in late-capitalist societies, hinting that human society may be moving “off limits”, beyond symbolic laws, in a trajectory of self-annihilation. This seminar is an attempt at critically departing from such diagnostics, which, it argues, foreclose the possibility of apprehending the rationality, and creativity, of multiple life forms, rendering unintelligible the lives and worlds of millions of people. It calls for the necessity of a renewed conversation between anthropology and psychoanalysis in cross-cultural perspective, and outlines the possibility of a different reading from within the corpus of psychoanalysis itself. In counterpoint with contemporary critics of the notion of the unconscious it argues for a renewed relevance of the psychoanalytic concept of subjectivity-in-alterity for the possibility of recognizing the intrinsic fragility, as well as the complexity, of multiple life forms -- if these concepts are understood otherwise, and beyond the bounds of their institutional operation. The seminar will open with an introduction to the notion of the unconscious, subjectivity and unconscious identification through the writings of Freud and Lacan, Winnicott and Aulagnier, as well as some contemporary critics, to establish the shared ground for further discussion. It develops as an exploration of questions of alterity and cultural translation in anthropological perspective, considering the Freudian concepts of subjectivity and the unconscious at the trial of other discursive traditions and conceptualizations of alterity (specifically, the ethical and eschatological tradition of Islam), both in philosophical terms and in the historical complexity of postcolonial situations. For it is in postcolonial contexts that the question is most prominently raised of how to think subjectivity in the experience of dispossession and fragmentation; in the interruption of intergenerational transmission; in the experience of madness between demonic possession and psychiatric illness and institutionalization; in the instability of the systems of reference. And it is in postcolonial contexts that the “question of the subject” (in Lacan’s expression) is increasingly re-formulated from within a theological and eschatological frame of reference – a re-formulation that challenges deeply rooted assumptions within the psychoanalytic community about the relation of subjectivity, secularization and the “hermeneutics of suspicion”, calling for theoretical reinvention. The seminar will conclude on a discussion of philosophical and institutional issues raised by an anthropological reflection on the representation and experience of madness/mental illness in comparative perspective. Readings include selections from S. Freud, J. Lacan, T.D. Winnicott, M. Borch-Jakobsen, M. Foucault, N. Rose, J. Derrida, P. Aulagnier, F. Benslama, De Certeau, Al-Ghazali, H. Corbin, S. Mahmood, C. Hirschkind, S. Pandolfo, E. Balibar, L. Binswanger, F. Basaglia, B. Good, E. Corin, V. Crapanzano, J. Jankins, V. Das, among others.
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||